It seems as if the world blew its mind on Wednesday of last week. People are grieving, others are cheering. At the forefront is a discussion about freedom of speech and what constitutes appropriate expression and what inappropriate language looks and sounds like. Sides are polarized, angry. The definition of appropriate speech as opposed to ‘hate speech’ is the crux of the discussion. Let’s think about that for a minute while I share my thoughts. I will be more than willing to hear your thoughts, as long as they are civil.
What hate speech is: Note: I used AI on Google to begin this list. Note that AI says that hate speech is specifically when expression is aimed at “race, religion, sexual orientation, or gender.” The unspoken part of that definition is that being white, Christian, and straight disqualifies you from being the recipient of hate speech, and to that I completely I disagree.
Forms of expression that intend harm.
Forms of expression that vilify another person or group.
Conversation that does not involve both parties listening and respecting the other’s views.
Name calling with high potency labels: fascist, racist, homophobe, bigot…
Forms of expression that incite hatred or violence against another person or group.
Expression that pulls the trigger on a bolt-action rifle aimed at another human being.
Expression that refuses to acknowledge another’s right to a differing opinion.
Expression that denies another the ability to share opposing viewpoints.
Celebrating the misfortune or grief of another.
What hate speech isn’t:
Feeling strongly and speaking passionately.
Speaking the truth as that person understands it.
Sharing honestly and earnestly one’s thoughts and opinions.
Desiring a frank discussion about an issue, a true give and take.
Refusing to take part in a lie.
Choosing not to take part in the delusions of others.
Doing one’s best at living, with the understanding that we all are fallible human beings.
